Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
UDC 338.2
UDC 330.3
In the context of modern challenges related to the need to ensure technological sovereignty and import substitution, the study of production and technological systems is becoming particularly relevant. Currently, the Russian industry needs to strengthen supply chains based on vertical and horizontal links, which requires in-depth theoretical understanding and adequate analysis tools. The article reveals theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of complex structures in industry with vertical and horizontal connections. The stages of the development of economic thought are shown: from neoclassicism to the methodology of the intersectoral approach. The advantages and disadvantages of key concepts are highlighted. The methodological approach of cross-industry balance based on matrix modeling is proposed as the most suitable tool for studying supply chains of complex configuration. This approach opens up great opportunities and allows us to comprehensively consider the structure of a chain consisting of a different number of levels and links interconnected by various methods of coordination.
methodology of intersectoral balance, supply chain, chain stability, chain stability, technological sovereignty
1. Tsvetkov, V. A. (2022). Economic Sovereignty of Russia in the Conditions of a New Reality. Bulletin of the National Institute of Business, 1(45), 25–30.
2. Lenchuk, E. B. (2025). Technological Sovereignty in the Focus of Russian Economic Policy. Scientific papers of the Free Economic Society of Russia, Vol. 253, No. 3, 421–431.
3. Pettit, T. J., Croxton, K. L., Fiksel, J. (2019). The evolution of resilience in supply chain management: a retrospective on ensuring supply chain resilience. Journal of business logistics, Vol. 40, No. 1, 56–65.
4. Ivanov, D. (2022). Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives – lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. Annals of Operations Research, 319, 1411–1431.
5. Lyubyashchenko, S. N. (2024). Modeling the functioning of the production and economic chain. Ideas and ideals, Vol. 16, No. 1–2, 333–350. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17212/2075-0862-2024-16.1.2-333-350.
6. Lyubyashchenko, S. N. (2023). Modeling the operation of a technological chain with vertical and horizontal interconnections of participants and taking into account demand. Modern competition, Vol. 17, No. 6(96), 61–76.
7. Lyubyashchenko, S. N. (2023). Forms of interaction of participants in supply chains: full integration versus autonomous functioning. Modern competition, Vol. 17, No. 2(92), 68–82.
8. Williamson, O. E. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: The Free Press, 286.
9. Kirdina-Chandler, S. G., Mayevsky, V. I. (2020). The evolution of heterodox mesoeconomics. Terra Economicus, Vol. 18, No. 3, 30–52.
10. Deryabina, M. A. (2019). Horizontal and vertical Structures in Economics: the evolution of Theoretical Foundations. Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 5, 9–23.
11. Petrov, S. P., Gilmundinov, V. M. (2022). Integration of supply chains as a form of vertical interaction in the theory of the firm. Voprosy ekonomiki, 3, 147–160
12. Sheresheva, M. Yu. (2010). Forms of network interaction of companies. Moscow: Publishing house of the Higher School of Economics, 339.
13. Kose, R. (2007). Firm, market and law. Moscow: New Publishing House, 224.
14. Scherer, F., Ross, D. (1997). The structure of industry markets. Moscow: Infra-M, 697.
15. Tyrol, J. (1996). Markets and market power: theory of industrial organization. St. Petersburg: Ekonomicheskaya shkola, 745.
16. Porter, M. (2011). Competition. St. Petersburg: Piter, 456.
17. Shapiro, J. (2006). Supply chain modeling. St. Petersburg: Piter, 720.
18. Aganbegyan, A. G., Granberg, A. G. (1968). Economic and mathematical analysis of the intersectoral balance of the USSR. Moscow: Mysl, 357.
19. Mamonov, V. I., Poluektov, V. A. (2019). Determining the volume of product supply in the supply chain. Business. Education. Pravo, 2(47), 142–147.
